Knowledge Center

SBR vs EPDM vs TPE: Choosing the Right Polymer Infill for Football Pitches

February 05 , 2026

When designing or upgrading a synthetic football pitch, the choice of infill granules is just as important as the artificial turf itself. Infill affects player safety, comfort, durability, heat behavior, and environmental perception of the field.

Among performance infills for football turf systems, SBR rubber infill, EPDM rubber infill, and TPE infill granules are the three most widely used polymer-based options. While all deliver proven playability, they differ significantly in source material, cost, consistency, environmental profile, and typical applications.

This guide compares these three infill types to help you select the most appropriate solution for your project.

Artificial turf football field surface showing polymer infill granules used for performance and player safety

Overview: Polymer Infills for Synthetic Football Turf

Polymer infills are installed between turf fibers to:

Support the grass blades

Absorb shock and reduce injury risk

Provide traction and ball response

Protect the turf system from excessive wear

SBR, EPDM, and TPE are all synthetic infills, but they serve different market segments and performance priorities.

Core Differences at a Glance

Aspect

SBR Rubber Infill

EPDM Rubber Infill

TPE Infill Granules

Source material

Recycled tire rubber (crumb rubber)

Virgin synthetic rubber (ethylene-propylene-diene)

Virgin thermoplastic elastomer (plastic–rubber blend)

Cost

Lowest cost; most economical option

More expensive than SBR

Similar to or higher than EPDM; clearly above SBR

Performance & feel

Good shock absorption and traction; proven for football and rugby

Stable performance across temperatures; soft underfoot, good UV resistance

High comfort, resilient, resists compaction, retains shape long-term

Consistency

Variable due to mixed tire sources

Highly consistent size, elasticity, and color

Very consistent; can be manufactured smooth and round

Heat buildup

Gets very hot in direct sunlight

Similar heat behavior to SBR

Can be engineered in lighter colors with lower heat retention

Environmental profile

Reuses waste tires but associated with microplastic and perception concerns

Virgin material with known composition; not microplastic-free

Virgin, recyclable material; often positioned as lower-impact synthetic

Typical positioning

Budget standard for schools and community fields

Premium or “elite” sports pitches

High-performance, sustainability-focused projects

 

SBR Rubber Infill: The Budget-Friendly Standard

SBR (Styrene-Butadiene Rubber) infill is made from recycled vehicle tires and has been used globally for decades in football and rugby fields.

SBR rubber infill granules made from recycled rubber, cost-effective infill for synthetic football turf

Where SBR Performs Well

Community football pitches

School and municipal fields

Projects with strict budget limits

Advantages

Lowest material cost

Widely available worldwide

Extensive historical performance data

Acceptable shock absorption and traction

Trade-Offs

Dark color absorbs heat, leading to higher surface temperatures

Variable granule composition due to mixed tire sources

Ongoing discussions around microplastics and chemical perception

Best fit:
Projects prioritizing cost efficiency and proven playability over premium aesthetics or sustainability branding.

 

EPDM Rubber Infill: Consistency and Premium Feel

EPDM infill is manufactured from virgin synthetic rubber, allowing for precise control over granule size, elasticity, and color.

EPDM rubber infill granules made from virgin rubber with UV stability and color consistency for synthetic football turf

Where EPDM Is Preferred

High-end football facilities

Training centers and academies

Projects requiring color consistency or branding

Advantages

Uniform granule quality and predictable performance

Good UV resistance and color stability

Softer feel underfoot than many SBR products

Reduced odor and contaminant concerns

Trade-Offs

Significantly higher cost than SBR

Heat behavior similar to dark SBR infills

Still a synthetic polymer with microplastic considerations

Best fit:
Facilities seeking elite performance consistency and controlled material quality with a higher budget.

TPE Infill Granules: Premium Performance and Recyclability

TPE (Thermoplastic Elastomer) infill combines rubber-like elasticity with plastic-like process control. It is increasingly used in high-specification football and multi-sport fields.

TPE infill granules, eco-friendly and 100% recyclable polymer infill for high-performance synthetic football turf systems

Where TPE Excels

Professional or intensively used pitches

Multi-sport facilities

Sustainability-driven projects

Advantages

Excellent resilience and shape retention

Resists compaction over long service life

Consistent granule size and smooth surface

Can be recycled at end of life

Available in lighter colors to reduce heat buildup

Trade-Offs

Premium price level

Still warmer than organic infills

Higher upfront investment

Best fit:
Projects prioritizing long-term performance, recyclability, and controlled material composition.

How to Choose the Right Infill for Your Football Pitch

When selecting between SBR, EPDM, and TPE, consider the following factors:

Budget constraints

Usage intensity (hours per week)

Player comfort and injury risk profile

Environmental requirements or public perception

Local climate and heat considerations

Project lifespan and maintenance strategy

There is no universal “best” infill—only the most appropriate option for a specific project context.

Conclusion

SBR, EPDM, and TPE infill granules all deliver reliable performance for synthetic football pitches, but they serve distinct market needs:

SBR remains the most economical and widely used solution

EPDM offers higher consistency and premium feel

TPE delivers top-tier resilience, recyclability, and long-term stability

Understanding these differences helps facility owners, designers, and consultants make informed, project-specific decisions that balance performance, cost, and sustainability goals.

Discover how CGT can elevate your next project—reach out today to explore tailored, future-ready sports surface solutions.

Related News
[2026-02-05] SBR vs EPDM vs TPE: Choosing the Right Polymer Infill for Football Pitches [2026-01-21] 2025 Company Review: Driving Global Sports Surface Solutions Through Innovation and Partnership [2026-01-05] CGT Achieves FIFA Quality Pro Certification, Setting a Globally Significant Benchmark in Professional Football Turf [2025-12-31] CGT Bahrain Asian Youth Games Main Stadium Track Achieves WA Class 1 Certification